Now don’t get me wrong, I love Harry Potter as much as the next guy. Well, I at least like the three I read. I couldn’t quite get into the fourth book. But that’s not the point. The point, is that the author is a bitch. Seriously.
She wrote a brilliant novel that actually got kids to read and she created a marvelous fantasy world that surpasses a majority of children’s books, while remaining interesting enough to adults that they can share in the interest. But Rowling seems to believe that it’s a world that only she can play in.
While the final book was still being finished, J.K. Rowling said in an interview, that she was contemplating killing Harry Potter in order to prevent anyone from continuing her work and she had playfully hinted at this fate several times in interviews. While, I think that she should be able to finish the book however she wants, to change her creative vision to prevent others from continuing her work is stupid and selfish. It’s a betrayal of the creative process. [I can't find the interview because it's so out of date. If you run across it toss me a link]
While that irked me because I’m a creative person, it didn’t irk me as much as what she’s doing now. She’s suing a Harry Potter fansite that wants to publish an encyclopedia of Harry Potter terms and characters. For copyright violation. She praised the website for being amazing, but that the book was theft. Her main concern is that she’s lose sales on the lexicon she hasn’t written yet. Bullshit.
Star Wars has lexicons. Star Trek has lexicons. Tolkien has lexicons. Hell, I’m pretty sure that someone has printed a Halo lexicon out there somewhere. These a books that fans make for the community. In fact, I think if I wrote a book and someone compiled the information, I would be flattered.
Especially because it won’t even slightly effect her sales. Not even alittle. None. Zero. No change at all. All she has to do is add more information on a couple topics that are not included in the lexicon. Harry’s favorite color or a few entries on new spells. Just a couple pages of unique material not available elsewhere and she’ll sell more copies. She controls the Harry Potter world after all.
Yet she won’t let a 50 year old librarian who loved the series and compiled a fan resource to make a single penny. His goal isn’t to piggyback on her success, he made the lexicon out of love. And she’s ruthlessly attacking a man that loved her work and was one of her biggest fans (as obvious from the amount of time he spent.)
Even worse, the media is sympathetic to Rowling. So are many of her fans. Why? I would imagine fans would be defending Van Der Ark. After all, next Rowling will be suing fan-fiction writer for not paying royalties or attacking fan-artists. As an artist and writer, I understand being protective of your work. But at a certain point you become overprotective. And then some point far after that, you become a huge greedy bitch. I wonder if she even likes her own work. It seems to be more of a cash cow to her instead of a living breathing world that awakened the imaginations of millions. It’s like building the most amazing playground in the world, but only letting people look at it. No one can play on it except Rowling.
One commenter didn’t want to talk about this and just insulted me. So here’s some more evidence which might help people out with seeing my point of view:
Someone that agrees with me!
Someone who has a different example of Rowling’s over-protective, hyper-controlling Nature!
Being a Harry Potter fan doesn’t mean you agree with everything the writer says. That’s just poppycock. I’m a gundam fan, but Wing Gundam and 00 Gundam were total shit. I’ve loved Star Wars for as long as I can remember, and George Lucas regularly does stuff I don’t like. But at least he doesn’t sue people that make useful lexicons and writers who have expanded his universe in several ways he might have never thought of himself.
For the sake of argument, lets say that Rowling is totally right for a second. If she really loved her fans in anyway, she’d collaborate with Van Der Arc and take a cut of the book. As opposed to vocally insulting and brutally crushing him.